<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer lays anchor in 1999, sets sail for the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/17/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/17</link>
	<description>musings over a tuna fish sandwich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Version Targeting and IE8 - Scott Vandehey&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/17/comment-page-1#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Version Targeting and IE8 - Scott Vandehey&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glyphobet.net/blog/?p=17#comment-777</guid>
		<description>[...] However, it&#8217;s possible to take that argument too far. According to Zeldman, nothing less than the future of standards-compliant design rests on this decision. Now, I worship the ground Jeffrey walks on just like every other good standardista - but this seems like a bit of a stretch. IF this happens, then this MIGHT happen, which MIGHT cause this doomsday scenario. Perhaps he&#8217;s got some insider information, and perhaps Microsoft is a much more dysfunctional company that it seems, but I don&#8217;t think the sky is falling over a META tag.  &#8220;The Linux kernel&#8230; doesn’t commit to supporting legacy APIs and ABIs. This means that kernel developers are able to make the right design decisions and rewrite broken code without having to worry about continuing to support applications that depend on buggy or poorly designed interfaces &#8230;and backwards compatibility does not act like an anchor on innovation. &#8211; Matt Chisholm, Internet Explorer lays Anchor in 1999 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, it&#8217;s possible to take that argument too far. According to Zeldman, nothing less than the future of standards-compliant design rests on this decision. Now, I worship the ground Jeffrey walks on just like every other good standardista &#8211; but this seems like a bit of a stretch. IF this happens, then this MIGHT happen, which MIGHT cause this doomsday scenario. Perhaps he&#8217;s got some insider information, and perhaps Microsoft is a much more dysfunctional company that it seems, but I don&#8217;t think the sky is falling over a META tag.  &#8220;The Linux kernel&#8230; doesn’t commit to supporting legacy APIs and ABIs. This means that kernel developers are able to make the right design decisions and rewrite broken code without having to worry about continuing to support applications that depend on buggy or poorly designed interfaces &#8230;and backwards compatibility does not act like an anchor on innovation. &#8211; Matt Chisholm, Internet Explorer lays Anchor in 1999 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Ninja &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Version Targeting and IE8</title>
		<link>http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/17/comment-page-1#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Ninja &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Version Targeting and IE8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glyphobet.net/blog/?p=17#comment-776</guid>
		<description>[...] However, it&#8217;s possible to take that argument too far. According to Zeldman, nothing less than the future of standards-compliant design rests on this decision. Now, I worship the ground Jeffrey walks on just like every other good standardista - but this seems like a bit of a stretch. IF this happens, then this MIGHT happen, which MIGHT cause this doomsday scenario. Perhaps he&#8217;s got some insider information, and perhaps Microsoft is a much more dysfunctional company that it seems, but I don&#8217;t think the sky is falling over a META tag.  &#8220;The Linux kernel&#8230; doesn’t commit to supporting legacy APIs and ABIs. This means that kernel developers are able to make the right design decisions and rewrite broken code without having to worry about continuing to support applications that depend on buggy or poorly designed interfaces &#8230;and backwards compatibility does not act like an anchor on innovation. &#8211; Matt Chisholm, Internet Explorer lays Anchor in 1999 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, it&#8217;s possible to take that argument too far. According to Zeldman, nothing less than the future of standards-compliant design rests on this decision. Now, I worship the ground Jeffrey walks on just like every other good standardista &#8211; but this seems like a bit of a stretch. IF this happens, then this MIGHT happen, which MIGHT cause this doomsday scenario. Perhaps he&#8217;s got some insider information, and perhaps Microsoft is a much more dysfunctional company that it seems, but I don&#8217;t think the sky is falling over a META tag.  &#8220;The Linux kernel&#8230; doesn’t commit to supporting legacy APIs and ABIs. This means that kernel developers are able to make the right design decisions and rewrite broken code without having to worry about continuing to support applications that depend on buggy or poorly designed interfaces &#8230;and backwards compatibility does not act like an anchor on innovation. &#8211; Matt Chisholm, Internet Explorer lays Anchor in 1999 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Hayden &#187; IE8 meta tag</title>
		<link>http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/17/comment-page-1#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hayden &#187; IE8 meta tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glyphobet.net/blog/?p=17#comment-761</guid>
		<description>I think what’s so confusing about this IE8 meta tag is that people are trying to explain it like it makes sense (since ALA likes it) and it just does not make any sense at all. This is one of the few articles that makes really good sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what’s so confusing about this IE8 meta tag is that people are trying to explain it like it makes sense (since ALA likes it) and it just does not make any sense at all. This is one of the few articles that makes really good sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->